From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Richter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CR-00518 MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CR-00518 MCE

02-13-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM RICHTER, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692 Acting Federal Defender TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377 Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant WILLIAM RICHTER


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
WILLIAM RICHTER

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND

EXCLUDE TIME


Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, William Richter, that the status conference scheduled for February 7, 2013, may be continued to March 14, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

Defense counsel has additional questions for the forensic technician who is reviewing computer materials seized from Mr. Richter. In the meantime, the parties have begun moving towards a resolution. To afford time to complete these tasks, the parties agree that the interests of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the parties in a speedy trial. The parties agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on March 14, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

________________________

MICHELLE PRINCE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

________________________

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Mr. Richter

ORDER

The status conference is continued to March 14, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Time under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded through that date for the reasons stated above and by agreement of the parties, the Court finding that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial for the reasons stated above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Richter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CR-00518 MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Richter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM RICHTER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CR-00518 MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)