From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rice

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 15, 2013
Cr.S. 12-0447-GEB (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2013)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, ANGELES ZARAGOZA, Assistant Federal Defender, Designated Counsel for Service, Sacramento, California. Attorney for Defendant MANDY RICE

          BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney JARED DOLAN Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by United States of America through Assistant United States Attorney JARED DOLAN and ANGELES ZARAGOZA Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for defendant, MANDY RICE that the status conference set for Friday, May 17, 2013 be continued to Friday, May 31, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

         The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

         The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

         Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for May 31, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

          ORDER

         The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

         The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties stipulation, up to and including May 31, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) T4 (reasonable time for counsel to prepare). It is further ordered that the May 17, 2013 status conference shall be continued until May 31, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.


Summaries of

United States v. Rice

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 15, 2013
Cr.S. 12-0447-GEB (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Rice

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MANDY RICE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 15, 2013

Citations

Cr.S. 12-0447-GEB (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2013)