From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Reynoso

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Nov 3, 2022
CR 19-0137 RB (D.N.M. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

CR 19-0137 RB

11-03-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIO REYNOSO, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS OR FEES

ROBERT C. BRACK, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Mario Reynoso's Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (Doc. 137.) For the reasons explained below, the Court concludes that Reynoso's appeal is not taken in good faith and, therefore, will deny his motion.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), “[a]n appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith.” For purposes of § 1915(a)(3), a good faith appeal is one that presents a “reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal.” Caravalho v. Pugh, 177 F.3d 1177, 1179 (10th Cir. 1999) (quotations omitted); see also Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 442-50 (1962). In determining good faith, the Court should not decide the merits of the issues on appeal but, instead, should only reach the question of whether the appellant has presented a reasoned and nonfrivolous argument. See Ragan v. Cox, 305 F.2d 58, 59-60 (10th Cir. 1962).

Reynoso fails to identify the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts to support his proposed appellate issues. (See Doc. 137.) For this reason, as well as the reasons set forth in the Court's September 15, 2022 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Reynoso's Motion to Appoint Counsel (see Doc. 132), the Court will deny the Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP and certify that his appeal is not taken in good faith.

The Court advises Reynoso that he may file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of fees in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within 30 days after service of this Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). “The motion must include a copy of the affidavit filed in the district court and the district court's statement of reasons for its action.” Id.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Doc. 137) is DENIED; the Court CERTIFIES that the appeal is not taken in good faith, and the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to notify the Court of Appeals of this denial and certification.


Summaries of

United States v. Reynoso

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Nov 3, 2022
CR 19-0137 RB (D.N.M. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Reynoso

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIO REYNOSO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

CR 19-0137 RB (D.N.M. Nov. 3, 2022)