Opinion
No. 2:06-CR-0264 WBS
01-17-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADRIAN REYNOSO, Defendant.
JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender TIMOTHY ZINDEL Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for ADRIAN REYNOSO BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney
JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377
Assistant Federal Defender
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-5700
Attorney for Defendant
ADRIAN REYNOSO
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE
AND EXCLUDING TIME
Date: January 22, 2013
Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, Adrian Reynoso, through their respective attorneys, that the status conference scheduled for January 22, 2013, may be continued to February 25, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.
Defense counsel again proposed a resolution of the case, which counsel for the United States has agreed to consider and may present to his supervisor. The parties are still also unsure about the availability of an essential witness. In order to afford time to complete their review and negotiations, the parties agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded through February 25, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
Respectfully submitted,
JOSEPH SCHLESINGER
Acting Federal Defender
_________________
TIMOTHY ZINDEL
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for ADRIAN REYNOSO
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
_________________
JASON HITT
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER
The status conference is continued to February 25, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. The Court finds that time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through that date in order to afford counsel reasonable time to prepare. Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________
WILLIAM B. SHUBB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE