From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Raya

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2013
Case No.: CR. S-12-187 TLN (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: CR. S-12-187 TLN

04-29-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIO RAYA, et al., Defendants.

PAUL HEMESATH Attorney for Plaintiff CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ Attorney for MARIO RAYA DOUGLAS BEEVERS Attorney for MANOLO REYES


CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ, SBN 207136
428 J Street, Suite 355
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 443-8055
Attorney for Defendant
MARIO RAYA

STIPULATION AND ORDER

VACATING DATE, CONTINUING

CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME


JUDGE: Hon. Troy L. Nunley

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Paul Hemesath, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Attorney Clemente M. Jimenez, Counsel for Defendant MARIO RAYA, and Douglas Beevers, counsel for Defendant Manolo Reyes, that the status conference scheduled for April 29, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., before Judge Shubb, be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on May 16, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. for further status conference.

This case was recently reassigned from Judge Shubb to Judge Nunley.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 et seq. be tolled pursuant to Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendants further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.

____________________________

PAUL HEMESATH

Attorney for Plaintiff

____________________________

CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ

Attorney for MARIO RAYA

____________________________

DOUGLAS BEEVERS

Attorney for MANOLO REYES

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter, scheduled for April 29, at 9:30 a.m., before Judge Shubb, be vacated and the matter continued to May 16, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. before this court for further status conference. The Court finds that time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through that date in order to afford counsel reasonable time to prepare. Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants to a speedy trial.

____________________________

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Raya

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 29, 2013
Case No.: CR. S-12-187 TLN (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Raya

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARIO RAYA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 29, 2013

Citations

Case No.: CR. S-12-187 TLN (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2013)