From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 4, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cr-00216-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cr-00216-MCE

02-04-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DESHAWN RAY, DAMION EDGERSON, and REGINALD THOMAS Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MATTHEW G. MORRIS Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
MATTHEW G. MORRIS
Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDING TIME FOR PURPOSES

OF THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT WITH

RESPECT TO DEFENDANTS RAY AND

THOMAS

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Morris and Defendants, Deshawn Ray, by and through his attorney, Julius Engel, and Reginald Thomas, by and through his attorney Colin Cooper, hereby stipulate as follows:

The parties agree that the status conference scheduled for January 31, 2013, be continued to March 7, 2013. The parties request the continuance based upon the following facts, which the parties believe demonstrate good cause to support the appropriate findings under the Speedy Trial Act:

Defendants Ray and Thomas are reviewing discovery and investigating the case, and are in discussions with the United States regarding potential resolution of the case without trial.

The government will require time to consider information not previously available to it before being able to determine whether that information affects the position the government would take in resolving the case or proceeding to trial.

The requested continuance is not based on congestion of the Court's calendar, lack of diligent preparation on the part of the attorney for the government or the defense, or failure on the part of the attorney for the government to obtain available witnesses.

For purposes of computing the date under the Speedy Trial Act by which defendant's trial must commence, the parties agree that the time period of January 31, 2013, to March 7, 2013, inclusive, should be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 because:

Under 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and local code T4, the delay results from a continuance granted by the Court at the defendant's request, with the agreement of the government, on the basis of the Court's finding that: (i) the delay will allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare; and (ii) the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

_______________

MATTHEW G. MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

Julius Engel, (as authorized 1/28/13)

JULIUS ENGEL

Attorney for DESHAWN RAY

Colin Cooper, (as authorized 1/28/13)

COLIN COOPER

Attorney for REGINALD THOMAS

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Ray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 4, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cr-00216-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Ray

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DESHAWN RAY, DAMION EDGERSON, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 4, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cr-00216-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2013)