From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ray

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 11, 2013
2:11-cr-00216-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2013)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, MATTHEW G. MORRIS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, California.

          ROBERT BYERS, Attorney for TIFFANY TUNG.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME FOR PURPOSES OF THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANT TIFFANY TUNG

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.

         Plaintiff United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Morris and Defendant Tiffany Tung, by and through her attorney, Robert Byers, hereby stipulate as follows:

         The parties agree that the status conference scheduled for June 6, 2013, be continued to August 15, 2013. The parties request the continuance based upon the following facts, which the parties believe demonstrate good cause to support the appropriate findings under the Speedy Trial Act:

         Defendant Tung is reviewing discovery and investigating the case, and is in discussions with the United States regarding potential resolution of the case without trial. The government is considering a request to provide early Jencks material and anticipates proving that material this week.

         The requested continuance is not based on congestion of the Court's calendar, lack of diligent preparation on the part of the attorney for the government or the defense, or failure on the part of the attorney for the government to obtain available witnesses.

         For purposes of computing the date under the Speedy Trial Act by which defendant's trial must commence, the parties agree that the time period of June 6, 2013 to August 15, 2013, inclusive, should be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 because under 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and local code T4, the delay results from a continuance granted by the Court at the defendant's request, with the agreement of the government, on the basis of the Court's finding that: (i) the delay will allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare; and (ii) the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         In accordance with the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the status conference in this matter is hereby continued from June 6, 2013 to August 15, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 7.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ray

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 11, 2013
2:11-cr-00216-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Ray

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DESHAWN A. RAY, REGINALD L…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 11, 2013

Citations

2:11-cr-00216-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2013)