From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ratcliffe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jun 12, 2019
No. 18-14216 (11th Cir. Jun. 12, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-14216

06-12-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BOBBY RATCLIFFE, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cr-00047-HES-MCR-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Ronald Falcon, appointed counsel for Bobby Ratcliffe in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ratcliffe's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ratcliffe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jun 12, 2019
No. 18-14216 (11th Cir. Jun. 12, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Ratcliffe

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BOBBY RATCLIFFE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 12, 2019

Citations

No. 18-14216 (11th Cir. Jun. 12, 2019)