From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ransfer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jan 28, 2014
743 F.3d 766 (11th Cir. 2014)

Summary

holding that prior cases permitting the warrantless use of a beeper constituted binding precedent for purpose of warrantless GPS tracking

Summary of this case from United States v. Fisher

Opinion

No. 12–12956.

2014-01-28

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Trevor RANSFER, Kendrick Lowe, Eric Hanna, Defendants–Appellants.


Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, in U.S. v. Ransfer, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 743 F.3d 766, was withdrawn from bound volume because it was revised and superseded April 14, 2014. For superseding opinion, see 2014 WL 1408633.


Summaries of

United States v. Ransfer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jan 28, 2014
743 F.3d 766 (11th Cir. 2014)

holding that prior cases permitting the warrantless use of a beeper constituted binding precedent for purpose of warrantless GPS tracking

Summary of this case from United States v. Fisher

holding that prior cases permitting the warrantless use of a beeper constituted binding precedent for purpose of warrantless GPS tracking

Summary of this case from United States v. Fisher
Case details for

United States v. Ransfer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TREVOR RANSFER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 28, 2014

Citations

743 F.3d 766 (11th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Fisher

As such, officers relying on these earlier cases were still within the scope of the good-faith safe harbor,…

United States v. Fisher

As such, officers relying on these earlier cases were still within the scope of the good-faith safe harbor,…