From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ramirez-Gonzalez

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 16, 2022
No. 21-MJ-4296 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022)

Opinion

21-MJ-4296

03-16-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GERMAN ANTONIO RAMIREZ-GONZALEZ, aka German Antonio Gonzalez, aka German Antonio Ramirez, aka German Antonio, Defendant.


ORDER OF DETENTION

ALKA SAGAR, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

I.

On March 16, 2022, Defendant made his initial appearance on the criminal complaint filed in this matter by consent to video teleconference. Deputy Federal Public Defender Neha Christerna was appointed to represent Defendant.

A detention hearing was held.

[ ] On motion of the Government [18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)] in a case allegedly involving an offense with maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death.

[x] On motion by the Government or on the Court's own motion [18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)] in a case allegedly involving a serious risk that the defendant will flee.

The Court concludes that the Government is not entitled to a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance as required and the safety or any person or the community [18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2)].

II.

The Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure:

[x] the appearance of the defendant as required.

[x] the safety of any person or the community.

III.

The Court has considered: (a) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device; (b) the weight of evidence against the defendant; (c) the history and characteristics of the defendant; and (d) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community. [18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)] The Court also considered all the evidence adduced at the hearing, the arguments of counsel, and the report and recommendation of the U.S. Pretrial Services Agency.

IV.

The Court bases its conclusions on the following: As to risk of non-appearance:

[x] Defendant has no legal status in the United States and was previously deported from the United States in March 2015, following his conviction for assault with a deadly weapon in April 2013.

[x] Insufficient bail resources. The Court will not consider Chantal Villasenor, the defendant's ex-partner, who has no legal status in the United States and who currently has a restraining order against Defendant, as a viable surety.

Defendant has returned to the United States following his deportation without permission before being found and charged with the instant offense. Thus, Defendant has not demonstrated a willingness to abide by court orders and the Court is not convinced that the defendant will abide by its order to appear for future court appearances if released on bail. Moreover the prospective penalty that defendant faces, if convicted of the charged offense, supports a finding that release on bail will pose a flight risk because defendant will likely be deported after serving the sentence imposed, and the Court finds that, in conjunction with the other factors noted above, this will provide an incentive to flee the jurisdiction.

As to danger to the community:

[x] Defendant's criminal history includes felony assault with a deadly weapon in 2013

[x] active restraining order

The Court finds that release on bail would pose a danger to others and to the community.

V.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant be detained until trial. The defendant will be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant will be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel. On order of a Court of the United States or on request of any attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is confined will deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding. [18U.S.C. §3142(i)]


Summaries of

United States v. Ramirez-Gonzalez

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 16, 2022
No. 21-MJ-4296 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Ramirez-Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GERMAN ANTONIO RAMIREZ-GONZALEZ…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 16, 2022

Citations

No. 21-MJ-4296 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022)