From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rahal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
2:08-CR-566 LKK (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

2:08-CR-566 LKK

05-02-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RANDAL LEE RAHAL, Defendant.

CHRISTOPHER D. ADAMS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Walder, Hayden & Brogan, P.A. DAVID W. DRATMAN Attorney at Law Attorneys for Defendant RANDALL LEE RAHAL BENJAMIN B. WAGNER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY MATTHEW D. SEGAL Assistant U.S. Attorney


CHRISTOPHER D. ADAMS
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Walder, Hayden & Brogan, P.A.
DAVID W. DRATMAN
Attorney at Law
Attorneys for Defendant
RANDALL LEE RAHAL

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING JUDGMENT

AND SENTENCING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the United States of America, through its attorney of record, Matthew D. Segal, Assistant U.S. Attorney; and, Randal Lee Rahal, through his attorneys, Christopher D. Adams, Walder, Hayden & Brogan, P.A. and David W. Dratman, that the Judgment and Sentencing presently scheduled for May 21, 2013 shall be continued to August 13, 2013 at 9:15 a.m. in accordance with the following schedule:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Judgment and Sentencing Date: ¦August ¦ ¦ ¦13, 2013;¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------------+---------¦ ¦Reply or Statement of Non-Opposition: ¦August 6,¦ ¦ ¦2013; ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------------+---------¦ ¦Motion For Correction Of The Presentence Report Filed With The ¦July 30, ¦ ¦Court And Served On The Probation Officer And Opposing Counsel No ¦2013; ¦ ¦Later Than: ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦The Presentence Report Filed With The Court And Disclosed To ¦July 23, ¦ ¦Counsel No Later Than: ¦2013; ¦ +------------------------------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦Counsel's Written Objections To The Presentence Report Delivered ¦July 9, ¦ ¦To The Probation Officer And Opposing Counsel No Later Than: ¦2013; ¦ +------------------------------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦The Proposed Presentence Report disclosed to counsel: ¦Disclosed.¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

CHRISTOPHER D. ADAMS

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

DAVID W. DRATMAN

_______________

DAVID W. DRATMAN

Attorneys for Defendant

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

_______________

MATTHEW D. SEGAL*

Assistant U.S. Attorney

*Signed with permission

ORDER

It is so ordered.

_______________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Rahal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
2:08-CR-566 LKK (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Rahal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RANDAL LEE RAHAL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

2:08-CR-566 LKK (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)