From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mennealy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 24, 2012
CASE NO. 3:12-cr-01809-L (S.D. Cal. May. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:12-cr-01809-L

05-24-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL JAY MENNEALY, Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:

___ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or
___ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or
X the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or
___ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or
___ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or
___ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;
X of the offense(s) as charged in the Information:
8 USC 1324 (a)(1)(A)(ii) and (v)(II) - Transportation of Illegal Aliens and Aiding and Abetting

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.

__________________

William McCurine,

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Mennealy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 24, 2012
CASE NO. 3:12-cr-01809-L (S.D. Cal. May. 24, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Mennealy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL JAY MENNEALY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 24, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 3:12-cr-01809-L (S.D. Cal. May. 24, 2012)