From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pratt

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 28, 2023
2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:92-cr-0205 WBS AC 2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC

11-28-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. AARON EDWARD PRATT, Movant.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Movant, a federal prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed petitions for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Movant filed identical petitions in Case No. 2:01-cr-0152 WBS AC, Case No. 2:92-cr-0205 WBS AC, and Case No. 2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC. The matters were referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

Magistrate Judge Alison Claire filed findings and recommendations recommending that the petition be denied in Case No. 2:01-cr-0152 WBS AC on July 18, 2019. (Docket No. 74 in Case No. 2:01-cr-0152 WBS AC.) This court adopted those findings and recommendations in full. (Docket No. 77 in Case No. 2:01-cr-0152 WBS AC.) Due to an administrative oversight, findings and recommendations were not initially filed in Case No. 2:92-cr-0205 WBS AC or Case No. 2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC.

The Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations on October 13, 2023 in Case No. 2:92-cr-0205 WBS AC and Case No. 2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC, recommending that the petitions be denied for the same reasons provided in her findings and recommendations in Case No. 2:01-cr-0152 WBS AC. (Docket No. 77 in Case No. 2:92-cr-0205 WBS AC; Docket No. 34 in Case No. 2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC.) The findings and recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations in either case.

The court has reviewed the files in Case No. 2:92-cr-0205 WBS AC and Case No. 2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 13, 2023 (Docket No. 77 in Case No. 2:92-cr-0205 WBS AC; Docket No. 34 in Case No. 2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC) are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner's applications for a writ of habeas corpus (Docket No. 74 in Case No. 2:92-cr-0205 WBS AC; Docket No. 31 in Case No. 2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC) are denied for the same reasons set forth in the July 18, 2019 findings and recommendations filed in United States v. Pratt, No. 2:01-cr-0152 WBS AC (Docket No. 74), which are incorporated herein by reference.


Summaries of

United States v. Pratt

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 28, 2023
2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Pratt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. AARON EDWARD PRATT, Movant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 28, 2023

Citations

2:01-cr-0118 WBS AC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2023)