From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Potter

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Feb 14, 2022
3:19-CR-55-TAV-JEM-3 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 14, 2022)

Opinion

3:19-CR-55-TAV-JEM-3

02-14-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. COY POTTER, Defendant.


ORDER

THOMAS A. VARLAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This criminal case is before the Court on the government's Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment as to Coy Potter [Doc. 119]. In support the government states that defendant pleaded guilty to charges in the original indictment and that such charges fully represent his conduct and the facts of this case.

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a) permits the government, with leave of court, to dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint. See also Gaitor v. United States, Nos. 2:11-CR-35, 2:15-CV-269, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87335, at *12-13 (E.D. Tenn. May 24, 2018) (citations omitted) (noting a superseding indictment does not nullify the original indictment). Accordingly, for good cause shown, the government's motion [Doc. 119] is GRANTED and the superseding indictment is DISMISSED as to this defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Potter

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Feb 14, 2022
3:19-CR-55-TAV-JEM-3 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 14, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. COY POTTER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Feb 14, 2022

Citations

3:19-CR-55-TAV-JEM-3 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 14, 2022)