From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Porter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 6, 2012
3:11-cr-00012 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 6, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cr-00012

09-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT PORTER, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Document #863, Johnson's Motion to Reveal Statements the Government Intends to Use As Co-Conspirator Statements and joined by Xavier Parnell, Dmitri Johnson, Porter, and Dinkins is DENIED. The evidentiary admissibility under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) of any statement is reserved for trial.

It is so ORDERED.

_________________

Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Porter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 6, 2012
3:11-cr-00012 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Porter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT PORTER, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

3:11-cr-00012 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 6, 2012)