Opinion
Case No. 3:11cr096
2013-09-18
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JANELE K. PITTS, Defendant.
JUDGE WALTER H. RICE
DECISION AND ENTRY FINDING DEFENDANT IN VIOLATION OF HER
SUPERVISED RELEASE, REVOKING SAME AND IMPOSING A
RE-IMPOSED PERIOD OF SUPERVISED RELEASE, UPON CERTAIN
STATED CONDITIONS; TWO CHANGES NOTED FROM THIS COURT'S
DISPOSITION ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2013; TERMINATION ENTRY; RIGHT
OF APPEAL EXPLAINED AND UNDERSTOOD
On September 11, 2013, the Defendant, having previously been found of violation of her supervised release which began December 22, 2010, appeared in open Court for final disposition.
Based upon the record made in open Court on the aforesaid September 11, 2013, this Court revoked the aforesaid supervised release and remanded the Defendant to the custody of the Attorney General of the United States/the Bureau of Prisons for a period of time served as of September 26, 2013, with a re-imposed period of supervised release to follow of three years, less the one month and four days served prior to the disposition of her supervised release matter. As conditions of the re-imposed period of supervised release, the Defendant is to follow and discharge all previously imposed, undischarged conditions of supervised release and, in addition, she is to enter the dual diagnosis treatment facility for inpatient care at Nova House on September 26, 2013, and to follow all the rules and regulations of that facility. Once she is released on aftercare, aftercare should be provided at Daymont West, a facility with which the Defendant has already had interaction.
The Court notes two differences from its disposition in open Court on September 11th, to wit: since bed space is not available in the dual diagnosis program at Nova House until September 26th, Defendant is to be held in County Jail until that time, rather than transferred to Nova House on September 23rd. Further, the Court mentioned in open Court aftercare at Nova House, whereas the Court has been advised, by United States Probation Officer Melissa Stidham, that Daymont West would be preferable for said aftercare, given that said Defendant has already had interaction with that facility.
Following the above, the Defendant was orally explained her right of appeal, and indicated an understanding of same.
The captioned cause is ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.
____________________________
WALTER H. RICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Counsel of record
Melissa Stidham, Probation Officer