From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pinto

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 28, 1967
374 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 16330.

Submitted March 9, 1967.

Decided March 28, 1967.

Barry H. Evenchick, East Orange, N.J., Brendan T. Byrne, Essex County Prosecutor, Newark, N.J., for appellant.

Lawrence Pierce, pro se.

Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Appellee was convicted of the crime of robbery in a New Jersey court. He made application for a writ of habeas corpus to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. He sought a new trial because the testimony in regard to the voluntariness of his incriminating statement was heard and determined by the trial judge in the presence of the jury. The District Court granted the writ and allowed the petitioner a new trial on the merits. That decision was plainly right.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed on the sound opinion of Judge Wortendyke which was filed September 29, 1966, 259 F. Supp. 729.


Summaries of

United States v. Pinto

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Mar 28, 1967
374 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1967)
Case details for

United States v. Pinto

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Lawrence PIERCE, Appellee, v. Warren…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 28, 1967

Citations

374 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Vigliano v. Thevos

We, of course, realize that this court has decided the present question contrary to the position taken by the…

Thomas v. State of New Jersey

This was error of constitutional dimensions and entitles the petitioner to a new trial. United States ex rel.…