From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pincombe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 7, 2015
2:14-cr-00178-JAD-GWF-1 (D. Nev. Dec. 7, 2015)

Opinion

2:14-cr-00178-JAD-GWF-1

12-07-2015

United States of America, Plaintiff v. Ian Alexander Pincombe, Defendant


Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

[ECF 77, 41]

Defendant Ian Pincombe stands charged with possession of child pornography and related offenses. These charges stem from an undercover "reverse sting" operation launched by Henderson Police Department Detective Tuan Yurek in response to Pincombe's personal advertisement on Craigslist. Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. heard Pincombe's motion to dismiss this case based on outrageous government conduct; found that Detective Yurek did not engage in outrageous conduct, and recommends that I deny Pincombe's motion. Objections were due by November 20, 2015, and Pincombe has neither filed an objection nor requested an extension to do so.

ECF 13

ECF 41, 70.

ECF 77. --------

"[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed." Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly,

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Magistrate Judge Foley's Report and Recommendation [ECF 77] is ADOPTED; Defendant's Motion to Dismiss For Outrageous Government Conduct [ECF 41] is DENIED. Dated: December 7, 2015.

/s/_________

Jennifer A. Dorsey

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Pincombe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 7, 2015
2:14-cr-00178-JAD-GWF-1 (D. Nev. Dec. 7, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Pincombe

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff v. Ian Alexander Pincombe, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 7, 2015

Citations

2:14-cr-00178-JAD-GWF-1 (D. Nev. Dec. 7, 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Lough

The Defendants have "the burden of proof on such a motion" and they simply have not satisfied this high…