From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 23, 2015
1:14CR000222-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2015)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, MICHAEL S. FRYE, MIA GIACOMAZZI, Assistant United States Attorney Fresno, CA Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America

          Roger Litmanm Mark Broughton, Attorney for Defendant, JERRY WAYNE PFEIFFER.


          STIPULATION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND DEFENDANT REGARDING PRODUCTION OF PROTECTED INFORMATION; PROTECTIVE ORDER Rule 16(d)

          LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

         WHEREAS, the defendant in the above-referenced matter is charged with a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2242(2)(a) and (B), sexual abuse, and 12 pages of pending discovery, bate-stamped 198-209, pertains to a forensic medical exam containing personnel and confidential information about the person identified as Jane Doe in this matter; and

         WHEREAS, due to the private nature of the contents of this pending discovery, the Government seeks a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d) limiting dissemination of the pages 198-209 to the attorney for Jerry Wayne Pfeiffer, his designated investigator and medical experts hired on behalf of Jerry Wayne Pfeiffer.

         The parties agree that entry of a stipulated protective order is an appropriate method of protecting the privacy interests of Jane Doe while allowing the attorney for Jerry Wayne Pfeiffer to adequately represent his client.

         THEREFORE, defendant Jerry Wayne Pfeiffer by and through his attorney Roger Litman, and the United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Michael S. Frye, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

         1. This Court may enter a protective order pursuant to Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and its general supervisory authority.

         2. This Order pertains only to discovery in this matter bate-stamped 198-209.

         3. By signing this Stipulation and Protective Order, Defense Counsel agrees not to disseminate pages 198 to 209 or share its contents with anyone other than his investigator on this matter and medical personnel he consults on this matter, and support staff.

         4. The discovery and information therein may be used only in connection with the litigation of this case and for no other purpose.

         5. Defense Counsel will store the discovery in a secure place and will use reasonable care to ensure that it is not disclosed to third persons in violation of this agreement.

         6. Defense Counsel shall be responsible for advising members of the defense team and defense witnesses of the contents of this Stipulation and Order.

         7. In the event that Defendant substitutes counsel, undersigned Defense Counsel agrees to withhold discovery from new counsel unless and until substituted counsel agrees also to be bound by this Order.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Pfeiffer

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 23, 2015
1:14CR000222-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Pfeiffer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JERRY WAYNE PFEIFFER Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 23, 2015

Citations

1:14CR000222-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2015)