From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Petrosino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Dec 10, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cr-120(1) (S.D. Ohio Dec. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cr-120(1) Also Civil Case No. 3:15-cv-268

12-10-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA ANTHONY PETROSINO, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. 45), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, and for good cause shown upon the Court's de novo review, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 39) is DENIED. Further, Defendant is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. December 10, 2015.

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Petrosino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Dec 10, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cr-120(1) (S.D. Ohio Dec. 10, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Petrosino

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSHUA ANTHONY PETROSINO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Dec 10, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cr-120(1) (S.D. Ohio Dec. 10, 2015)