From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Peterson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Dec 14, 2015
4:15CR3076 (D. Neb. Dec. 14, 2015)

Opinion

4:15CR3076

12-14-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS PETERSON, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on the findings and recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart on November 23, 2015 (filing 19). Judge Zwart recommends that the defendant's motion to dismiss (filing 15) be denied in its entirety. No objections have been filed to the findings and recommendation, and the matter is now ripe for decision under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

I find and conclude after de novo review that Judge Zwart has correctly found the facts and applied the law. Her findings and recommendation therefore will be adopted, and the defendant's motion will be denied in all respects.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's findings and recommendation (filing 19) are adopted.

2. The defendant's motion to dismiss (filing 15) is denied in all respects.

December 14, 2015.

BY THE COURT:

Richard G. Kopf

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Peterson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Dec 14, 2015
4:15CR3076 (D. Neb. Dec. 14, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS PETERSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Dec 14, 2015

Citations

4:15CR3076 (D. Neb. Dec. 14, 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Buntyn

The facial constitutionality of § 242 was settled long ago, Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 103-04, 65…