From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-00238-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-00238-MCE

01-23-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NICHOLAS PERRY and ERIC JOHNSTON, Defendant.

KRESTA NORA DALY, SBN 199689 BARTH TOZER & DALY LLP Attorneys for Defendant NICHOLAS PERRY JAN DAVID KAROWSKY Attorney for ERIC JOHNSTON KYLE REARDON Assistant United States Attorney


KRESTA NORA DALY, SBN 199689
BARTH TOZER & DALY LLP
Attorneys for Defendant NICHOLAS PERRY

STIPULATION AND ORDER

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through Kyle Reardon, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant, Nicholas Perry, through his counsel, Kresta Nora Daly, and defendant Eric Johnston, through his counsel Jan David Karowsky, that the status conference set for January 24, 2013 be vacated. The parties request a new status hearing be set for March 14, 2013.

All counsel require additional time for on-going negotiations.

The parties stipulate time should be excluded pursuant to Local Code T4 for preparation of counsel. The parties further stipulate this continuance is necessary in furtherance of justice and outweighs the interests of the defendant and the public for a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

BARTH TOZER & DALY LLP

By ___________________

KRESTA NORA DALY

Attorneys for NICHOLAS PERRY

By Kresta Nora Daly for

JAN DAVID KAROWSKY

Attorney for ERIC JOHNSTON

By ___________________

KYLE REARDON

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

For the reasons stipulated by the parties the status hearing set for January 24, 2013 is vacated. A status hearing will be set for March 14, 2013. The Court finds excludable time through March 14, 2013 under Title 18, United States Code Section (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 to allow for preparation and continuity of counsel. The Court finds that the interest of justice served by granting the request outweighs the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-00238-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NICHOLAS PERRY and ERIC JOHNSTON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-00238-MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2013)