From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 5, 2013
No. CR-S-12-353-WBS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR-S-12-353-WBS

02-05-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BARBARA PERRY, Defendant.

MICHAEL ANDERSON Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender ANGELES ZARAGOZA Assistant Federal Defender Counsel for Defendant BARBARA PERRY


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, #87692
Acting Federal Defender
ANGELES ZARAGOZA, #270198
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-5700
Attorney for Defendant
BARBARA PERRY

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

ORDERING PRE-PLEA PRESENTENCE

CRIMINAL HISTORY REPORT


Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

The parties mutually request that the Court order the U.S. Probation office to prepare a Pre-Plea Presentence Criminal History report. Defense investigation of this issue suggests results of such a review and report will have a substantial ameliorative effect on advisory guideline computations and a consequential beneficial effect on the ability of the parties to reach mutually agreeable terms of resolution of the case without trial.

The court is advised that defense counsel has conferred with Supervising U.S. Probation Officer Hugo Ortiz who has advised that five to six weeks is needed for the probation office to perform this task. He has also advised that the Probation Office needs an order from the court directing them to undertake this inquiry. A proposed order as requested by Mr. Ortiz follows this stipulation. The court's deputy clerk has advised defense counsel that the court is available for status conference on March 18, 2013, thereby allowing the Probation Office the time they require to prepare the requested report.

For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of March 4, 2013 to March 18, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

__________________________

MICHAEL ANDERSON

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

___________________________

ANGELES ZARAGOZA

Assistant Federal Defender

Counsel for Defendant

BARBARA PERRY

ORDER

The above stipulation of the parties is accepted.

The probation office is directed to conduct the criminal history review requested in the above stipulation and report its results to counsel for each of the parties on or before March 18, 2013, unless a later date is subsequently set by the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By the Court,

______________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 5, 2013
No. CR-S-12-353-WBS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BARBARA PERRY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 5, 2013

Citations

No. CR-S-12-353-WBS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2013)