From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perez-Cruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 11, 2012
2:10-CR-575 JCM (VCF) (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2012)

Opinion

2:10-CR-575 JCM (VCF)

10-11-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s), v. RUBEN PEREZ-CRUZ, Defendant(s).


ORDER

Presently before the court is the government's motion to extend time (first request) to respond to petitioner's § 2255 petition (doc. # 156), and the government's motion to waive attorney-client privilege (doc. # 157).

Petitioner filed his motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on September 12, 2012. (Doc. # 153). In a minute order, this court ordered the government to respond by October 16, 2012. (Doc. # 154). The government timely filed this motion to extend time to respond to the § 2255 petition until November 16, 2012. (Doc. # 156).

Local rule 6-1 permits an extension of time for good cause. The government cites the need to obtain from Michael L. Becker, Esq., a sworn affidavit. (See id.). Mr. Becker represented petitioner in the criminal case, and petitioner has made ineffective assistance of counsel allegations regarding the representation provided by Mr. Becker. (See id.). The court finds good cause.

The government also seeks a waiver of the attorney-client privilege between petitioner and Mr. Becker. It is well established that a habeas petitioner severs the attorney-client privilege when the petitioner files a § 2255 petition asserting ineffective assistance of counsel. Bittaker v. Woodford, 331 F.3d 715, 716-17 (9th Cir. 2003) ("It has long been the rule in the federal courts that, where a habeas petitioner raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, he waives the attorney-client privilege as to all communications with his allegedly ineffective lawyer."). The court waives the attorney-client privilege between petitioner and Mr. Becker.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the government's motion to extend time (first request) (doc. # 156) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the government's motion to waive attorney-client privilege (doc. # 157) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Perez-Cruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 11, 2012
2:10-CR-575 JCM (VCF) (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Perez-Cruz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s), v. RUBEN PEREZ-CRUZ, Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 11, 2012

Citations

2:10-CR-575 JCM (VCF) (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

Szewczyk v. United States

The Court recognizes that, on occasion, federal courts have both implied a waiver of the attorney-client…

Barrett v. United States

However, the Court recognizes that, on occasion, federal courts have both implied a waiver of the…