Opinion
Case No. 1:12CR0061 LJO-SKO
02-28-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO PEREZ, Defendant
KYLE J. HUMPHREY (SBN 118477) THE LAW OFFICES OF KYLE J. HUMPHREY Attorneys for Alejandro Perez
KYLE J. HUMPHREY (SBN 118477)
THE LAW OFFICES OF KYLE J. HUMPHREY
Attorneys for
Alejandro Perez
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE MOTIONS SCHEDULE
Date: April 15, 2013
The Defendant, ALEJANDRO PEREZ, by and through his attorney of record, Kyle J. Humphrey, and the United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, Brian Enos, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The motions hearing in this matter is currently set for April 15, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. 2. The defense is seeking a continuance of the motions deadline schedule currently set but requests that the current date for hearing on the motions remain the same. 3. The defense is requesting that a new motions schedule be set as follows: defendant's motions are due by March 7, 2013; the government's opposition due by March 29, 2013; defendant's reply to oppositions due by April 5, 2013; and the current motions hearing date of April 15, 2013, at 1:00 p.m. remain the same. 4. The United States has no objection to the requested continuance and the dates selected. The date was selected after consultation between the attorneys regarding the motions schedule. 5. The parties agree that the time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, as previously agreed, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
The Law Office of Kyle J. Humphrey
By: ________________________
Kyle J. Humphrey, Attorney for Defendant,
ALEJANDRO PEREZ
United States Attorney's Office
By: ________
Brian Enos
Assistant United States Attorney
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions schedule in this matter be reset as follows: defendant's motions are due by March 7, 2013; the government's opposition due by March 29, 2013; defendant's reply to oppositions due by April 5, 2013; and the current motions hearing date of April 15, 2013, at 1:00 p.m. remain the same.
Time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, for the reasons outlined in the stipulation, through that date and time as well. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE