From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Perera

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 2, 2013
CR. S-10-347 MCE (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2013)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, Sacramento, California.

          TODD D. LERAS, Assistant U.S. Attorney,

          DWIGHT SAMUEL, Attorney for Defendant, DISHAN PERERA.

          OLAF HEDBERG, Attorney for Defendant LEONARD WOODFORK.

          JOHN VIRGA, Attorney for Defendant, NAVPREET SINGH.

          CHRISTOPHER HAYDN-MYER, Attorney for Defendant, LOVEDEEP SIDHU.

          MARK REICHEL, Attorney for Defendant, NAVJOT SINGH.

          DAN KOUKOL, Attorney for Defendant, JASON CAVILEER.

          CHRISTOPHER COSCA, Attorney for Defendant, RAMIRO GARCIA.

          SHARI L. RUSK, Attorney for Defendant, TOREY MOORE.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Chief District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Todd D. Leras, and Attorney Dwight Samuel on behalf of Dishan Perera, Attorney Olaf Hedberg on behalf of Leonard Woodfork, Attorney John Virga on behalf of Navpreet Singh, Attorney Christopher Haydn-Myer on behalf of Lovedeep Sidhu, Attorney Mark Reichel on behalf of Navjot Singh, Attorney Dan Koukol on behalf of Jason Cavileer, Attorney Shari Rusk on behalf of Torey Moore, and Attorney Christopher Cosca on behalf of Ramiro Garcia, that the status conference scheduled for April 4, 2013, be continued to May 16, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

         Attorney Dwight Samuel was recently appointed to represent Dishan Perera in this matter. The government reproduced the voluminous discovery in this wiretap investigation and provided it to Mr. Samuel prior to the last scheduled status conference date. Given the volume of material, he is still reviewing it and discussing it with his client. In addition, continuing investigation is occurring on behalf of other defendants related to the extent of their participation in the conspiracy alleged in the case. This investigation impacts the potential sentencing guidelines applicable to each of the alleged participants. Given the voluminous discovery, including telephone calls intercepted during the course of three successive rounds of wiretaps, counsel requires additional preparation time. The parties therefore request to continue the status conference to May 16, 2013.

         For the above-stated reasons, the parties stipulate that time be excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv); Local Code T4 (reasonable time to prepare and continuity of counsel). Defense counsel have authorized Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd D. Leras to sign this stipulation on their behalf.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

         1. A status conference in this matter is set for May 16, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.;

         2. Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court finds that the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (reasonable time to prepare) up to and including May 16, 2013.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Perera

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 2, 2013
CR. S-10-347 MCE (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Perera

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DISHAN PERERA, LEONARD WOODFORK…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 2, 2013

Citations

CR. S-10-347 MCE (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2013)