From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Peraza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 19, 2017
Case No. 2:14-cr-0229-APG-NJK (D. Nev. May. 19, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-cr-0229-APG-NJK

05-19-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANKIE ALLEN PERAZA, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS

ECF No. 61

Defendant Frankie Allen Peraza filed a motion to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officers. ECF No. 61. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, Magistrate Judge Koppe entered her Report & Recommendation recommending that the motion to suppress be denied. ECF No. 103. Mr. Peraza filed an Objection to the Report & Recommendation (ECF No. 141) and the Government filed a Response (ECF No. 145). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(b), I have conducted a de novo review of the motion to suppress and related papers. Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Koppe's Report & Recommendation (ECF No. 103) is accepted. Mr. Peraza's motion to suppress (ECF No. 61) is denied.

Dated: May 19th, 2017.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Peraza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 19, 2017
Case No. 2:14-cr-0229-APG-NJK (D. Nev. May. 19, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Peraza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANKIE ALLEN PERAZA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: May 19, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:14-cr-0229-APG-NJK (D. Nev. May. 19, 2017)