From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pennix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Jul 24, 2017
Civil No. - JFM-16-1262 (D. Md. Jul. 24, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. - JFM-16-1262 Criminal No. JFM-96-0289

07-24-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH PENNIX


MEMORANDUM

Joseph Pennix has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. §2255. The motion will be denied.

Pennix claims that he is entitled to relief under Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). He is not. In Beckles v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 886 (2017), the Supreme Court held that the Sentencing Guidelines are not subject to a vagueness challenge under the Due Process Clause.

A separate order effecting the ruling in this memorandum is being entered herewith. Date: July 24, 2017

/s/_________

J. Frederick Motz

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Pennix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Jul 24, 2017
Civil No. - JFM-16-1262 (D. Md. Jul. 24, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Pennix

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH PENNIX

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Date published: Jul 24, 2017

Citations

Civil No. - JFM-16-1262 (D. Md. Jul. 24, 2017)