From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Peimbert-Alonso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 16, 2012
CASE NO. 11CR4343-AJB (S.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11CR4343-AJB

11-16-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JORGE RAFAEL PEIMBERT-ALONSO, Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that: _ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or _ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or X the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal following a finding of incompetence; or _ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for dismissal/judgment of acquittal; or _ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or _ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty; X of the offense(s) as charged in the Information:

8 USC 1326 fa) and (b)

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.

________________________

Hon. ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Peimbert-Alonso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 16, 2012
CASE NO. 11CR4343-AJB (S.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Peimbert-Alonso

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JORGE RAFAEL PEIMBERT-ALONSO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 11CR4343-AJB (S.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2012)