From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Patton

UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Feb 20, 2014
Case No. 1:11-cr-79 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 20, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cr-79

02-20-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES L. PATTON, Defendant.


Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #139), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Grounds One, Two, Three, and Four of the Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed October 28, 2013 (Doc. #132), are procedurally defaulted and are dismissed with prejudice. The case remains pending on Defendant's Amended § 2255 Motion (Doc. No. 140).

__________

Susan J. Dlott

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Patton

UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
Feb 20, 2014
Case No. 1:11-cr-79 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 20, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Patton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES L. PATTON, Defendant.

Court:UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI

Date published: Feb 20, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cr-79 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 20, 2014)