From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Parrish

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 10, 2023
4:23-MJ-70297 MAG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2023)

Opinion

4:23-MJ-70297 MAG

08-10-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. IAN PARRISH, Defendant.

JODI LINKER Federal Public Defender Northern District of California JOYCE LEAVITT Assistant Federal Public Defender. ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney Northern District of California EVAN M. MATEER Assistant United States Attorney.


JODI LINKER Federal Public Defender Northern District of California JOYCE LEAVITT Assistant Federal Public Defender.

ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney Northern District of California EVAN M. MATEER Assistant United States Attorney.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, EXCLUDE TIME, AND EXTEND DEADLINES UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND FED R. CRIM. P. 5.1 TO AUGUST 22, 2023

HON. DONNA M. RYU Chief United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action that the status hearing for defendant Ian Parrish scheduled for August 16, 2023, before the duty magistrate judge, be continued to Tuesday, August 22, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. before the duty magistrate for status or arraignment on information. The reason for the continuance is as follows: Defense counsel has additional information to provide to the government which should be provided within the next day. The parties are continuing to negotiate a resolution and are hopeful that an additional week will be sufficient to be prepared for waiver of indictment and arraignment. The continuance is sought under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties agree and stipulate that the time until August 22, 2023, should be excluded, under 18 U.S.C. §3161(H)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for effective preparation of counsel because the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy and public trial for the reasons described above.

The parties further stipulate that, with the consent of the defendant, there is good cause for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and for extending the 30-day time period for an indictment under the Speedy Trial Act for the reasons discussed above. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1; 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, EXCLUDE TIME, AND EXTEND DEADLINES UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND FED R. CRIM. P. 5.1 TO AUGUST 22, 2023

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status hearing for defendant Ian Parrish, currently scheduled for August 16, 2023, at 10:30 a.m., is continued to August 22, 2023, at 10:30 a.m., before the duty magistrate for status or arraignment on information and waiver of indictment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time until August 22, 2023, is hereby excluded from the Speedy Trial Act, under 18 U.S.C. §3161(H)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for effective preparation taking into account due diligence as described in the stipulation. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by the granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy and public trial. The Court finds good cause for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and extending the 30-day time period for an indictment under the Speedy Trial Act for the reasons discussed above. See Fed.R. Crim. P. 5.1; 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Parrish

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 10, 2023
4:23-MJ-70297 MAG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Parrish

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. IAN PARRISH, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 10, 2023

Citations

4:23-MJ-70297 MAG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2023)