From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pandy

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 10, 2021
21 Cr. 341 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2021)

Opinion

21 Cr. 341 (PGG)

09-10-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK PANDY, Defendant.


HONORABLE PAUL G. GARDEPHE JUDGE

WHEREAS, the Court has referred to the Magistrate Judge on duty the change-of-plea proceeding for defendant MARK PANDY;

WHEREAS the defendant has requested that his guilty plea be taken remotely by videoconference or by teleconference, if videoconference is not reasonably available;

WHEREAS the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic necessitates that the proceeding take place remotely;

WHEREAS the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Securities Act, findings made by the Judicial Conference of the United States, and the June 24, 2020 Amended Standing Order of the Chief Judge of the Southern District of New York allow for guilty pleas to be taken by videoconference, or teleconference if videoconferencing is not reasonably available, subject to certain findings made by the District Judge;

WHEREAS the Court understands that the Magistrate Judge on duty shall hear the defendant's plea by telephone because videoconference is not reasonably available;

THE COURT HEREBY FINDS that because the defendant has consented to proceeding remotely and because the defendant is detained, the plea proceeding cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice and may proceed remotely by teleconference.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Pandy

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 10, 2021
21 Cr. 341 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Pandy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK PANDY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 10, 2021

Citations

21 Cr. 341 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2021)