From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Palomera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
Case No. 1:12-CR-00428-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-CR-00428-AWI-BAM

01-24-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROY PALOMERA, Defendant.

JAMES M. MAKASIAN (SBN 71791) JAMES M. MAKASIAN, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Attorney for Defendant


JAMES M. MAKASIAN (SBN 71791)
JAMES M. MAKASIAN,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Attorney for Defendant

STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE

AND ORDER THEREON


DATE: January 28th, 2013

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties and their respective counsel, that the Second Status Conference currently set for Monday, January 28th, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. may be continued to February 25, 2013, a date convenient to counsel if acceptable to the court. The parties agree to the target such a date because Defendant's counsel is currently in a jury trial on the matter of Hudson v. County of Fresno , Fresno Superior Court Case #09CECG03295MBS.

It will also allow additional time for counsel to explore in good faith dispute resolution to avoid trial; or if not resolved, then to better prepare for said hearing.

______________

JAMES M. MAKASIAN, ATTORNEY FOR

DEFENDANT

______________

DAVID L. GAPPA, U.S. ATTORNEY FOR

PLAINTIFF

The court having considered the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

The Second Status Conference in the above-entitled matter is continued to February 25, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. in Department 8.

The delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation, defense investigation, and plea negotiation purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161 (h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Palomera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
Case No. 1:12-CR-00428-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Palomera

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROY PALOMERA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-CR-00428-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)