From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Owens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 21, 2020
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:13-cr-00291 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 21, 2020)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:13-cr-00291

09-21-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RETSYN DESHAWN OWENS


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the court is ECF No. 25, Defendant Retsyn Deshawn Owens' Clarification and Resubmission of his earlier pro se Motion for Compassionate Release [ECF No. 18]. I have already issued an Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Compassionate Release without prejudice on May 29, 2020, because, at that time, Defendant had not exhausted his administrative remedies. [ECF No. 20]. Defendant now supplements his Motion with evidence that he has since met the administrative exhaustion requirement. However, upon further investigation into Defendant's case, I must DENY this Motion [ECF No. 25].

On December 27, 2013, Judge Thomas E. Johnston revoked Defendant's supervised release in this case and sentenced him to 24 months of imprisonment. That term of imprisonment was to run consecutive to Defendant's sentence in a separate case, Criminal Action: 2:13-cr-00088. [ECF No. 7]. In Criminal Action No. 2:13-cr-00088, [ECF No. 39] (Jan. 2, 2014), Judge Johnston sentenced Mr. Owens to 151 months of imprisonment followed by three years of supervised release for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. On May 29, 2020, this case was reassigned to me. [ECF No. 19]. However, Defendant's term of imprisonment in this case has long been completed. At this time, Defendant is only serving his term of imprisonment imposed in Criminal Action No. 2:13-cr-00088. That case has not been reassigned to me.

Because I am not the presiding judge over Defendant's current term of imprisonment, and because there is no term of imprisonment left for me to possibly reduce in this case, I must DENY Defendant's Motion [ECF No. 25]. If Defendant, who is acting pro se, wishes to pursue a motion for compassionate release, he is hereby DIRECTED to file a new motion stating all of his grounds for relief in Criminal Action No. 2:13-cr-00088. To be clear, Defendant cannot simply file a motion for reconsideration asking the court to consider the documents filed in this case, as he has done here. Defendant must begin anew by filing a complete motion for compassionate release in the proper case.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the defendant and counsel, the United States Attorney, the United States Probation Office, and the United States Marshal.

ENTER: September 21, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Owens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 21, 2020
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:13-cr-00291 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 21, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Owens

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RETSYN DESHAWN OWENS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 21, 2020

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:13-cr-00291 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 21, 2020)