From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Otero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jun 8, 2012
Criminal No. 11-23 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jun. 8, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal No. 11-23 (SRC)

06-08-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NELSON OTERO and MAXCIME CAGAN, Defendants.


ORDER

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter having come before the Court on the motion filed by pro se Defendant Nelson Otero ("Otero") for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(c) [docket entry 92]; and Plaintiff the United States of America having opposed the motion; and the Court having considered the papers filed by the parties; and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith;

IT IS on this 8th day of June, 2012,

ORDERED that Defendant Otero's motion for judgment of acquittal [docket entry 92] be and hereby is DENIED.

____________

STANLEY R. CHESLER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Otero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jun 8, 2012
Criminal No. 11-23 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jun. 8, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Otero

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NELSON OTERO and MAXCIME CAGAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jun 8, 2012

Citations

Criminal No. 11-23 (SRC) (D.N.J. Jun. 8, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Colvard

Although Colvard advances this argument in connection with her motion for judgment of acquittal, it is not…