United States v. Ortiz-Flores

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OMAR ORTIZ-FLORES (1), Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 20, 2012

CASE NO. 10CR2692-JM (S.D. Cal. Jan. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 10CR2692-JM

01-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OMAR ORTIZ-FLORES (1), Defendant.

Jeffrey T. Miller

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:

__ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or

__ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or

X the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or

__ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or

__ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or

__ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;

__ of the offense(s) as charged in the Indictment/Information:

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.

______________________

Jeffrey T. Miller

U.S. District Judge