From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ortiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 5, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-00302 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:12-cr-00302 AWI-BAM

02-05-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HECTOR ORTIZ, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692 Acting Federal Defender CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant HECTOR ORTIZ


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
Attorney for Defendant
HECTOR ORTIZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING


DATE: April 22, 2013

JUDGE: Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the status conference in the above-captioned matter now set for February 11, 2013, may be continued to April 22, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. before Magistrate Barbara A. McAuliffe.

This continuance is at the request of defense counsel as defense needs additional time in preparation of this case. Defense counsel has now viewed the evidence in this case. Additionally, defense is in receipt of an offer from the government and would like to propose a counter-offer which it is currently drafting and plans to send to the government by the end of the week. Finally, defense has some ongoing investigation it would like to complete.

The requested continuance is with the intention of conserving time and resources for both parties and the court. The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation, defense investigation, and plea negotiation purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: ______________________

KIMBERLY A. SANCHEZ

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

By: ______________________

CHARLES J. LEE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

HECTOR ORTIZ

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Ortiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 5, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-00302 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HECTOR ORTIZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 5, 2013

Citations

No. 1:12-cr-00302 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2013)