From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ordway

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 7, 1887
30 F. 36 (9th Cir. 1887)

Opinion


30 F. 36 (D.Or. 1887) UNITED STATES v. ORDWAY and others. United States Circuit Court, D. Oregon. March 7, 1887

DEADY, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the foregoing one. It is alleged in the complaint that on May 1, 1883, and divers days since, the defendants cut and removed from the public lands of the United States, to-wit, the W. 1/2 of section 13 of township 3 N., of range 9 E. of the Wallamet meridian, situate in Washington Territory, 600 trees, and cut the same into cord-wood, to-wit, 3,000 cords, of the value of $7,500, and wrongfully converted the same to their own use, to the damage of the plaintiff $7,500. The defenses are similar to those made in the foregoing case, to-wit: Denials; a license from the Northern Pacific Railway Company; and the cutting was done in good faith. In the second defense it is alleged that the premises are within the limits of the grant to the Northern Pacific on the line of its general route between Portland and Wallula junction, and that, acting under a license from said corporation, they cut and removed from said half section not more than 1,800 cords of wood, of no greater value when standing in the tree than 10 cents a cord.

The demurrer to the defenses of good faith is overruled, and sustained to that of license from the Northern Pacific.


Summaries of

United States v. Ordway

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 7, 1887
30 F. 36 (9th Cir. 1887)
Case details for

United States v. Ordway

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. ORDWAY and others.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 7, 1887

Citations

30 F. 36 (9th Cir. 1887)

Citing Cases

United States v. Brandestein

the supreme court in Buttz v. Railroad Co., 119 U.S. 55, 7 Sup.Ctp.Rep. 100, from which the same conclusions…