From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Oladele

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jul 9, 2018
No. 17-2961 (8th Cir. Jul. 9, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-2961

07-09-2018

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis [Unpublished] Before WOLLMAN, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud and received a sentence of 50 months in prison. Oladele challenges his sentence, arguing that the district court committed procedural error and that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. After a careful review of the record, we reject both arguments, particularly given that the court imposed a below-Guidelines-range sentence. See United States v. Chavarria-Ortiz, 828 F.3d 668, 671-72 (8th Cir. 2016) (approving of a similar explanation for a within-Guidelines-range sentence); United States v. Lazarski, 560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009) ("[I]t is nearly inconceivable that the court abused its discretion in [sentencing below the Guidelines and] not varying downward still further."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. --------


Summaries of

United States v. Oladele

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jul 9, 2018
No. 17-2961 (8th Cir. Jul. 9, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Oladele

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Abiodun Oluwaseye Oladele…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jul 9, 2018

Citations

No. 17-2961 (8th Cir. Jul. 9, 2018)