From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ocegueda

United States District Court Middle Distrivt of Tennessee At Aasbbille
Jan 3, 2012
Crim. No. 3:02-CR-128-5 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Crim. No. 3:02-CR-128-5 Civil No. 3:09-cv-132

01-03-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSE MORAN OCEGUEDA, Defendant-Movant.


HON. W.J. HAYNES , JR. MAG


MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION F.R.Civ.P. 59(e)

COMES NOW DEFENDANT-MOVANT Jose Moran Ocegueda, and respectfully moves this HONORABLE COURT to reconsider the denial of. The grounds for this motion hereinafter more fully appear.

1. ) The Court unlawfully denied evidentiary hearing because factual disputes existed which could not be determined from the "files and records of the case".

2. ) The Court unlawfully relied on the Court of Appeals' decision for facts in this case. The gravamen of Mr. Ocegueda's Section 2255 motion was that the facts were unconstitutionally presented due to ineffective assistance of counsel in the pretrial, trial, sentencing and direct appeal process in the case.


Summaries of

United States v. Ocegueda

United States District Court Middle Distrivt of Tennessee At Aasbbille
Jan 3, 2012
Crim. No. 3:02-CR-128-5 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 3, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Ocegueda

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSE MORAN OCEGUEDA…

Court:United States District Court Middle Distrivt of Tennessee At Aasbbille

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

Crim. No. 3:02-CR-128-5 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 3, 2012)