From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Noyes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
5:2011-cr-00010-VAP (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

5:2011-cr-00010-VAP

08-01-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Noyes Defendant.


ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i))


I.

A. () On motion of the Government involving an alleged

1. () crime of violence;
2. () offense with maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death;
3. () narcotics or controlled substance offense with maximum sentence of ten or more years (21 U.S.C. §§ 80K/951. et. seq.,/955a):
4. () felony - defendant convicted of two or more prior offenses described above;
5. () any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence that involves a minor victim, or possession or use of a firearm or destructive device or any other dangerous weapon, or a failure to register under 18 U.S.C § 2250.

B. 3n motion (√) by the Government) / () (by the Court sua sponte involving)

1. () serious risk defendant will flee;
2. () serious risk defendant will
a. () obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice;
b. () threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror or attempt to do so

II.

The Court finds no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure:

A. (√) appearance of defendant as required; and/or

B. (√) safety of any person or the community.

III.

The Court has considered:

A. (√) the nature and circumstances of the offense, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device;

B. (√) the weight of evidence against the defendant;

C. (√) the history and characteristics of the defendant;

D. (√)the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or to the community.

IV.

The Court concludes:

A. (√) Defendant poses a risk to the safety of other persons or the community because: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________

B. (√) History and characteristics indicate a serious risk that defendant will flee because: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________

C. () A serious risk exists that defendant will:

1. () obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice;
2. () threaten, injure or intimidate a witness/ juror, because:

D. () Defendant has not rebutted by sufficient evidence to the contrary the presumption provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (e).

IT IS ORDERED that defendant be detained prior to trial.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant be confined as far as practicable in a corrections facility separate from persons awaiting or serving sentences or person held pending appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with his counsel.

______________________________

U.S. MAGISTRATE/ DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Noyes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
5:2011-cr-00010-VAP (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Noyes

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Noyes Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

5:2011-cr-00010-VAP (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)