From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nolan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Apr 11, 2013
Case No.: 1:10-CR-00131 AWI (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:10-CR-00131 AWI

04-11-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH NOLAN, Defendant.

ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI, CSBN: 068525 NICHOLAS A. CAPOZZI, CSBN: 275568 LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI Attorney for Defendant, JOSEPH NOLAN


ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI, CSBN: 068525
NICHOLAS A. CAPOZZI, CSBN: 275568
LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI
Attorney for Defendant,
JOSEPH NOLAN

AMENDED STIPULATION AND

ORDER TO CONTINUE CHANGE OF

PLEA


Date: April 15, 2013

Hon. Anthony W. Ishii

Defendant, JOSEPH NOLAN, by and through his attorney of record, Anthony P. Capozzi and the United States Attorney by and through Karen A. Escobar, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for change of plea on April 15, 2013, at 10:00 a.m.

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the change of plea until April 22, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. and to exclude time between April 15, 2013, and April 22, 2013, under 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv). Plaintiff does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. Due to an unforeseen event Defense Counsel is unavailable on Monday, April 15, 2013.
b. The government does not object to the continuance.
c. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
d. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of April 15, 2013, to April 22, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________

KAREN A. ESCOBAR

Attorney for United States

________________________

ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI

Attorney for Defendant

JOSEPH NOLAN

ORDER

For reasons set forth above, the continuance requested by the parties is granted for good cause and time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act from April 15, 2013, to, and including, April 22, 2013, based upon the Court's finding that the ends of justice outweigh the public's and defendant's interest in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS ORDERED that the Change of Plea currently scheduled for April 15, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. is continued to April 22, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Nolan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Apr 11, 2013
Case No.: 1:10-CR-00131 AWI (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Nolan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH NOLAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 1:10-CR-00131 AWI (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2013)