From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Noble

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTSRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
Case No. 10-cr-00437 WBS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 10-cr-00437 WBS

03-07-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DERICK NOBLE and JONATHAN GONZALEZ, Defendants.

Timothy E. Warriner (SB#166128) Attorney at Law Attorney for Defendant, Derick Noble Danny D. Brace, Jr., Attorney for Defendant, Jonathan Gonzalez Jill Thomas, Assistant U.S. Attorney


Timothy E. Warriner (SB#166128)
Attorney at Law
Attorney for Defendant,
Derick Noble

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

It is hereby stipulated between Jill Thomas, Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy E. Warriner, attorney for defendant Derick Noble, and Danny D. Brace, Jr., attorney for Jonathan Gonzalez, that the status conference date of March 11, 2013 should be continued until April 29, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. The continuance is necessary as counsel are continuing to engage in plea negotiations, and to investigate factual and legal issues that relate to the defendants' expected plea agreements.

IT IS STIUPULATED that the period of time from March 11, 2013 up to and including April 29, 2013 be excluded in computing the time within which the trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7) and Local Code T4, for ongoing preparation of counsel. Counsel further stipulates that the interests of justice in excluding time outweigh the interests of the defendants and the public in a speedy trial.

Timothy E. Warriner, Attorney for

Defendant, Derick Noble

Danny D. Brace, Jr., Attorney for

Defendant, Jonathan Gonzalez

Jill Thomas, Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that the status conference scheduled for March 11, 2013 be continued to April 29, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., and that the time period from March 11, 2013 to April 29, 2013 be excluded from calculation under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) and Local Code T4. Also pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the court finds that the interests of justice in excluding time outweigh the interests of the defendants and the public in a speedy trial.

______________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Noble

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTSRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
Case No. 10-cr-00437 WBS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Noble

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DERICK NOBLE and JONATHAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTSRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

Case No. 10-cr-00437 WBS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)