From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Nhung Thi Vu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2013
NO. CR-S-10-284 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2013)

Opinion

NO. CR-S-10-284 MCE

01-30-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NHUNG THI VU, et al., Defendants.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender MATTHEW C. BOCKMON Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant NHUNG THI VU DINA SANTOS Attorney for Defendant HUNG NGOC PHAM MARK REICHEL Attorney for Defendant CUONG THOI LONG DAVID FISCHER Attorney for Defendant THUY THI TRAN ERIN RADEKIN Attorney for Defendant DIEP HOANG VU BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney TODD LERAS Assistant United States Attorney


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
Matthew C. Bockmon, Bar # 161566
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-5700
Attorney for Defendant
NHUNG THI VU

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND

TO EXCLUDE TIME PURSUANT TO THE

SPEEDY TRIAL ACT


Date: February 21, 2013

Judge: Morrison C. England, Jr.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through Todd Leras, Assistant U.S. Attorney, defendant NHUNG THI VU, by and through his counsel, Matthew C. Bockmon, Assistant Federal Defender, defendant HUNG NGOC PHAM, by and through her counsel, Dina Santos, defendant CUONG THOI LONG, by and through his counsel, Mark Reichel, defendant THUY THI TRAN by and through her counsel David Fischer, and, defendant DIEP HOANG VU, by and through his counsel, Erin Radekin, that the status conference hearing date of Thursday, January 24, 2013, be vacated and a status conference hearing date be set for Thursday, February 21, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time for consultation with their clients.

It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, January 23, 2013, through and including the date of the status conference hearing, February 21, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv)and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare], and that the ends of justice to be served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

___________

MATTHEW C. BOCKMON

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

NHUNG THI VU

___________

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

HUNG NGOC PHAM

___________

MARK REICHEL

Attorney for Defendant

CUONG THOI LONG

___________

DAVID FISCHER

Attorney for Defendant

THUY THI TRAN

___________

ERIN RADEKIN

Attorney for Defendant

DIEP HOANG VU

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

___________

TODD LERAS

Assistant United States Attorney
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.
NHUNG THI VU, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CR-S-10-284 MCE


PROPOSED ORDER VACATING STATUS

CONFERENCE AND SETTING CHANGE OF

PLEA HEARING AND EXCLUDING TIME

PURSUANT TO THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

For the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties, filed on January 23, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status conference currently scheduled for Thursday, January 24, 2013, be vacated and that a new status conference hearing be set on Thursday, February 21, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the parties' January 23, 2013, stipulation, the time under the Speedy Trial Act is excluded from the date of this stipulation, January 23, 2013, through and including February 21, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4, due to the need to provide defense counsel with the reasonable time to prepare.

___________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Nhung Thi Vu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2013
NO. CR-S-10-284 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Nhung Thi Vu

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NHUNG THI VU, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2013

Citations

NO. CR-S-10-284 MCE (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2013)