Summary
In Navaro, we held that a district judge fully complied with Rule 32 by stating that he "`did not consider [the] alleged inaccuracies'" in determining sentence. 774 F.2d at 566 (quoting district court).
Summary of this case from U.S. v. RomanoOpinion
No. 235, Docket 85-1182.
Submitted October 1, 1985.
Decided October 2, 1985.
Mark P. Hutchison, Elmira, N.Y., for defendant-appellant.
Jonathan W. Feldman, Asst. U.S. Atty., W.D.N.Y., Rochester, N.Y. (Salvatore R. Martoche, U.S. Atty., W.D.N.Y., Buffalo, N.Y., of counsel), for appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of New York.
Before LUMBARD, MANSFIELD and WINTER, Circuit Judges.
The sole issue raised on appeal is a claim that the district judge erred when he did not make findings of fact with regard to alleged inaccuracies in the presentence report. However, the district judge explicitly stated that he "did not consider [the] alleged inaccuracies" in his determination of the sentence to be imposed. He thus fully complied with the requirements of Rule 32(c)(3)(D)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and was not otherwise required to make findings with regard to the alleged inaccuracies. United States v. Ibarra, 737 F.2d 825, 827 (9th Cir. 1984).
Affirmed.