From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mysin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
Cr.S. 11-427-LKK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Cr.S. 11-427-LKK

03-25-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VALERI MYSIN et al., Defendants.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender MATTHEW M. SCOBLE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for ANGELA SHAVLOVSKY Matthew M. Scoble for JOHN DUREE JR. Attorney for VALERI MYSIN Matthew M. Scoble for DINA SANTOS Attorney for MICHAEL KENNEDY Matthew M. Scoble for JULIA YOUNG Attorney for BORIS MURZAK Matthew M. Scoble for JULIA YOUNG Attorney for ZINAIDA MURZAK Matthew M. Scoble for JOHN BALAZS Attorney for VITALIY TUZMAN BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Matthew M. Scoble for LEE BICKLEY Assistant U.S. Attorney


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Bar# 87692
Acting Federal Defender
MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Bar# 237432
Assistant Federal Defender
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone (916) 498-5700
Attorney for Defendant
ANGELA SHAVLOVSKY

STIPULATION AND ORDER


DATE: June 25, 2013

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through, LEE BICKLEY, Assistant U.S. Attorney, defendant, ANGELA SHAVLOVSKY by and through her counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, JOHN DUREE JR., attorney for VALERI MYSIN, DINA SANTOS, attorney for MICHAEL KENNEDY, JULIA YOUNG, attorney for BORIS MURZAK, and attorney for ZINAIDA MURZAK, and JOHN BALAZS, attorney for VITALIY TUZMAN, that the status conference set for Thursday, March 26, 2012, be continued to Tuesday, June 25, 2013, at 9:15 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

The parties agree that the requested continuance is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The parties agree that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, and they ask the Court to exclude time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act from the date of this stipulation, March 20, 2013, through June 25, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4, pertaining to reasonable time for defense preparation.

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

_________________

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for ANGELA SHAVLOVSKY

Matthew M. Scoble for

JOHN DUREE JR.

Attorney for VALERI MYSIN

Matthew M. Scoble for

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for MICHAEL KENNEDY

Matthew M. Scoble for

JULIA YOUNG

Attorney for BORIS MURZAK

Matthew M. Scoble for

JULIA YOUNG

Attorney for ZINAIDA MURZAK

Matthew M. Scoble for

JOHN BALAZS

Attorney for VITALIY TUZMAN

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Matthew M. Scoble for

LEE BICKLEY

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The Court having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the parties' stipulation as its order in its entirety. It is ordered that the status conference presently set for March 26, 2013, be continued to June 25, 2013, at 9:15 a.m. The Court hereby finds that the requested continuance is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

It is ordered that time from the date of the parties' stipulation, March 15, 2013, up to and including, the June 25, 2013, status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Mysin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
Cr.S. 11-427-LKK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Mysin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VALERI MYSIN et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

Cr.S. 11-427-LKK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)