From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mysin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 15, 2013
11-cr-427 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2013)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, #122664 Federal Defender, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, #237432 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Defendant ANGELA SHAVLOVSKY.

          JOHN DUREE JR., Attorney for VALERI MYSIN.

          JOSEPH WISEMAN, Attorney for ALEXANDER KOKHANETS.

          DINA SANTOS, Attorney for MICHAEL KENNEDY.

          JULIA YOUNG, Attorneys for BORIS MURZAK, ZINAIDA MURZAK.

          JOHN BALAZS, Attorney for VITALIY TUZMAN.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME

          LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

         It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through, LEE BICKLEY, Assistant U.S. Attorney, defendant, ANGELA SHAVLOVSKY by and through her counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, JOHN DUREE JR., attorney for VALERI MYSIN, DINA SANTOS, attorney for MICHAEL KENNEDY, JOSEPH WISEMAN, attorney for ALEXANDER KOKHANETS, JULIA YOUNG, attorney for BORIS MURZAK, and attorney for ZINAIDA MURZAK, and JOHN BALAZS, attorney for VITALIY TUZMAN, that the status conference set for Wednesday, October 16, 2013, be continued to Tuesday, December 17, 2013, at 9:15 a.m.

         The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

         The parties agree that the requested continuance is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The parties agree that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, and they ask the Court to exclude time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act from the date of this stipulation, October 11, 2013, through December 17, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4, pertaining to reasonable time for defense preparation.

          ORDER

         The Court having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the parties' stipulation as its order in its entirety. It is ordered that the status conference presently set for October 16, 2013, be continued to December 17, 2013, at 9:15 a.m. The Court hereby finds that the requested continuance is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

         It is ordered that time from the date of the parties' stipulation, October 11, 2013, up to and including, the December 17, 2013, status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Mysin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 15, 2013
11-cr-427 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Mysin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VALERI MYSIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 15, 2013

Citations

11-cr-427 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2013)