From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Munoz-Cruz

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 16, 2006
168 F. App'x 163 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted February 13, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Frank Noonan, Esq., USPO-Office of the U.S. Attorney Mark O. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stephen R. Sady, Esq., FPDOR-Federal Public Defender's Office Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Malcolm F. Marsh, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-04-00064-MFM.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Juan David Munoz-Cruz appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction to one count of illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Because Munoz-Cruz was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Munoz-Cruz

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 16, 2006
168 F. App'x 163 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Munoz-Cruz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Juan David MUNOZ-CRUZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 16, 2006

Citations

168 F. App'x 163 (9th Cir. 2006)