From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mua

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 5, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-00132 LJO-SKO-1 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:12-cr-00132 LJO-SKO-1

04-05-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PANG MUA, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KIMBERLEY A. SANCHEZ Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender ERIC V. KERSTEN Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant Pang Mua


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
ERIC V. KERSTEN, Bar #226429
Assistant Federal Defender
2300 Tulare Street, Suite 330
Fresno, California 93721-2226
Telephone: (559) 487-5561
Attorney for Defendant
Pang Mua

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATE FOR

HEARING ON MOTION; ORDER THEREON


Date: May 13, 2013

Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, KIMBERLEY A SANCHEZ, Assistant United States Attorney, and ERIC V. KERSTEN, Assistant Federal Defender, counsel for Defendant Pang Mua, that the time for hearing on defendant's pending motion to suppress, currently scheduled for April 15, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., may be continued to May 13, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.. It is further stipulated that filing date for the government's opposition to defendant's motions may be continued to May 6, 2013.

The defense has filed a motion to suppress evidence resulting from the stop of Mr. Mua's vehicle on January 5, 2012. The resolution of this matter will likely require an evidentiary hearing to resolve factual disputes. The parties are engaged in negotiations and related activities which could resolve the case and eliminate the need to litigate the motion.

Based on the foregoing, the parties agree that time shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation and for ruling on the motions pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§§3161(h)(1)(D), 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(B)(iv). For these reasons, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested modification of the briefing schedule outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By _______________

KIMBERLEY A. SANCHEZ

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

By _______________

ERIC V. KERSTEN

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Pang Mua

ORDER

The intervening period of delay is excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(1)(D), 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(B)(iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Mua

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 5, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-00132 LJO-SKO-1 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Mua

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PANG MUA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 5, 2013

Citations

No. 1:12-cr-00132 LJO-SKO-1 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2013)