From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Moses

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-CR-0448 TLN (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-CR-0448 TLN

05-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HEATHER MOSES, Defendant.

SCOTT N. CAMERON Attorney at Law Attorney for: HEATHER MOSES BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney Jared Dolan Assistant U.S. Attorney


SCOTT N. CAMERON
Attorney at Law
Attorney for:
HEATHER MOSES

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING

STATUS CONFERENCE


DATE: May 9, 2013

COURT: Hon. Troy L. Nunley


Stipulation

The government and defendant Heather Moses, through undersigned counsel, stipulate that the status conference, scheduled for May 9, 2013, may be continued to June 13, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. The government has provided the defense approximately 2,500 pages of relevant discovery as well as recorded statements. Moreover, defense counsel has made an informal request for discovery of certain documents and the government is in the process of obtaining those documents. As such, the additional time requested in this stipulation is necessary so defense counsel can review the discovery and conduct investigation.

Further, both parties agree and stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. As such, the parties agree that time may be excluded from the speedy trial calculation under the Speedy Trial Act for counsel preparation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4.

The prosecutor has authorized the defense counsel for Heather Moses to sign this stipulation on his behalf.

BENJAMIN WAGNER

United States Attorney

by Scott N. Cameron, for

Jared Dolan

Assistant U.S. Attorney

by ____________________

Scott N. Cameron

Counsel for Heather Moses

ORDER

Good cause appearing,

The status conference, scheduled for May 6, 2013, is continued to June 13, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial in this case. Time is excluded from the speedy trial calculation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 for counsel preparation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Moses

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-CR-0448 TLN (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Moses

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HEATHER MOSES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-CR-0448 TLN (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)